• FiniteBanjo@lemmy.todayOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    This effectively makes all minerals the state’s property and prevents commerce with other nations who specialize in heavy machinery or electronics including: USA, UK, EU, SK, and Japan.

    • sunzu@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      prevents commerce with other nations who specialize in heavy machinery or electronics

      how

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.todayOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Previously, Beijing already started enforcing a ban on exports of REE and related technology exports.

        The new regulations include a strict database on REEs outlining when and where they were extracted all the way to where they’re exported. The laws stipulate that “no organization or person may encroach on or destroy rare-earth resources.”

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          So they limited supply to our industrial base?

          Aint this something that WTO would handle?

          • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.todayOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            A bit off topic about who is supposed to handle it, but tbh I don’t expect trade relations can get any worse with China even as a result of them banning exports of these. Certainly isn’t going to get better.

            • sunzu@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              I don’t see how that is off-topic. If we are having a trade issue, WTO should rule on it so every body knows what is “right”

              More preferable to this escalation circle jerk IMHO.

              Either way, if do chose this route, then we should call out people who blundered decades of industrial policy that got us here then.

              • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.todayOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I explained what China was doing, you asked for elaboration, I elaborated, and then you responded “but but but what about all those other countries?”

                That’s off topic.

                • sunzu@kbin.run
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  This is a discussion. China behavior is part of the bigger picture.

                  Are you here just to plug a specific narrative?

                  My point mainly is why US allowed this to happened, how US got here, and is this not WTO issue, which you are very carefully tip toeing around tho