• KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    The problem with cosmetic microtransactions is that it gives the creators a monetary incentive to make sure nothing you can earn in the game is as appealing as the microtransaction items, or that their availability (in cases where you can earn the same items in-game) are low enough that you’ll never reasonably earn what you want.

    You can say ‘Cosmetics don’t matter!’ but the astronomical sales of cosmetic items pretty much proves that to the majority of players, that is not the case.

    They also often intentionally create game mechanics specifically to ensure that players who aren’t paying see the better-looking players who did pay.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      You can say ‘Cosmetics don’t matter!’ but the astronomical sales of cosmetic items pretty much proves that to the majority of players, that is not the case.

      Is it a majority of players or a minority that pays unsustainable sums?

    • Bookmeat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      The problem with cosmetic items is the payout % to the artist. It’s so fucking low, I have no idea why artists work so hard for it.

    • And009@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Obviously, paying customers would want to look and feel premium. Plenty of events and rewards provide content that look good.

      It’s the desire to look different that drives the high volume cosmetic sales. If someone can’t afford it, they don’t lose out on content but still able to access a full-fledged game.

      That’s a great thing, not possible without microtransactions.