• shortwavesurfer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    There are several ways to buy it:

    xmrbazaar.com Username: beta Password: tester click “Earn XMR”

    Or if you already have 0.11XMR Haveno DEX

    Or if you have another crypto Trocador (keep it under 1k USD and “A” or “B” rated to get insurance.

    As for if anybody is selling 3D printed gun parts. I’m not sure.

    • DogWater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well the thing is, you buy the printer and print the parts. Then you buy things like a barrel, internals, magazines, sights, etc.

      The most ridiculous part of this? You can just buy an 80% Glock or ar lower receiver. It takes minimal googling to learn how to finish that last 20%. In some cases it comes with a jig and instructions. So, Tracking 3d printers is fucking absurd. The amount of people buying a 3d printer solely for the purpose of constructing a firearm is minuscule. And of those, most are hobbyists.

        • DogWater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Right, sorry if my lingo made the point unclear. An 80% frame or receiver is legally NOT a firearm and when completed won’t have a serial and is also a ghost gun. My point was that the 3d printer as a flag for them to start to investigate is absolutely ridiculous.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        This is specific to New York, which has banned making your own firearms. In the state I live in, there would be absolutely nothing illegal about buying 80% parts and building my own firearms. Or, if I really hated myself, buying a benchtop CNC mill, and trying to make a functioning 2011.

        Tracking the sale of certain classes of items and having reams of data is obviously a huge problem; the only way to correct it would be to enact privacy laws that forbade companies from selling or sharing data with any gov’t agency without a warrant, and then limiting the warrant to a single person’s transactions.

        • DogWater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah I figured that NY must have made 80% parts illegal based on the context of this whole case.