So, you can spot chatGPT. Does that make it any less true or relevant. I’d be more impressed if you commented on the content itself, not how is was derived. I try and use the right tool for the job. Chat GPT does a better job with grammar and spelling that I do. I always check it over, because it’s not intelligent, but it’s still a tool worth using for putting together articles, howto’s, and some code work.
Who is the intended audience? The overlap between people who trust AI written articles and people who are interested in freedom Money is pretty much non existent.
We know that AI can and does lie incredibly convincing. We know that AI is the preferred tool for manipulative and profit-driven content. If anything, using AI devalues the valid points. Spellcheck should catch most spelling issues, and “unusual” grammer gives writing character and makes it human. Don’t be fooled and think that AI does a better job then you could.
So, you can spot chatGPT. Does that make it any less true or relevant. I’d be more impressed if you commented on the content itself, not how is was derived. I try and use the right tool for the job. Chat GPT does a better job with grammar and spelling that I do. I always check it over, because it’s not intelligent, but it’s still a tool worth using for putting together articles, howto’s, and some code work.
Who is the intended audience? The overlap between people who trust AI written articles and people who are interested in freedom Money is pretty much non existent.
We know that AI can and does lie incredibly convincing. We know that AI is the preferred tool for manipulative and profit-driven content. If anything, using AI devalues the valid points. Spellcheck should catch most spelling issues, and “unusual” grammer gives writing character and makes it human. Don’t be fooled and think that AI does a better job then you could.