• chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    It might be theoretically possible where there is cell service, but keep in mind that a lot of homeless people do not have and are unable to get bank accounts. De-banking can be and is used as a tool to control people generally. Being cashless might be benign if you are in a situation where the banks, financial apps, and governments can be trusted not to weaponize their absolute control over everyone’s money, but in many places they cannot.

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yes, US Banks, famously the picture of honesty. If you know one thing about the US banks it’s how honest they truly are. If you know two things the other is probably the depression or the 2008 financial crisis, don’t worry about that though, they’re as trustworthy as the CIA which has definitely stopped all those nefarious things they did as soon as Alan Dulles died.

            • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Not being from the US or Canada I don’t know the first thing about your banks or the CIA. That said, it just seems ridiculous to me that a bank would control you through the management of your money.

              • freedomPusher@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Visa, Mastercard, Amex, and Paypal famously colluded to block donations to wikileaks. That control was exercised at an international level.

              • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                To you, because you don’t know the first thing about our banks, no offense. If you did you wouldn’t trust them either lol. It seems absolutely plausible they’d do it imo. They already do it with criminals to an extent, which could be argued as fair I suppose, but I don’t want to see that expand at the very least.

          • uis@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Lol, what? I guess Europe is wilderness then.

      • englislanguage@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I guess almost any country has (some) untrustworthy banks. So whatever country is planning to go cashless, they will have both.

      • freedomPusher@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, France, and Spain. Banks in those places will freeze your account easily, like a doc on file expiring.

        US banks are more trustworthy with your money than European banks, but US banks are less trustworthy with your data. Exceptionally, there is a pitfall where you can lose your money: dormancy. I recall a woman in California who had a safe deposit box that she did not access for a number of years. The bank declared it “dormant”, drilled it, and gave the property to the state’s unclaimed assets, who then auctioned off her stuff.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      In a cashless society, everyone would have a bank account.

      Nobody wants to cut off people from the economy. Whether you want a cashless society or not.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        You’re right, let’s switch to a cashless society, there’s no way someone like Trump could win again and decide to delist all his political enemies and of course “those dirty nwords and queers” to help his complete dictatorship style takeover of America. I mean, it’s not like the Nazis forced the Jewish population to report their wealth right after the anschluss so that they’d be able to steal it easier during aryanization which one legal advisor for the Nazi Ministry of Economics deemed the “forerunner to a complete and definitive removal of Jews from the German economy.”

        And of course it’s not like making all currency digital and controlled by the same government that would be taken over by said cult of personality would make that even easier to do this time around or anything. Don’t worry though of course “that could never happen here.”