• donio@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    When you have a goose that produces a reliable daily supply of golden eggs do you:

    1. keep collecting your daily egg
      or
    2. see if giving it a good kick or two gets you more eggs
      • kuresov@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        “The ~$10MM in profit we booked last year is not enough!” The curse of infinite growth.

    • Zifnab25@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      As YouTube increases the number and length of ads, the amount of traffic behind blockers rises accordingly.

      This is also just… a function of the evolving digital space. The consolidation of the internet ownership sphere and the modernized APIs/coding tools afford server-side content warehouses more and more power over what the end user receives.

      Because AWS owns all the fucking rack space, because ISP monopolies are the defining feature of western net access, and Microsoft force-feeds people their proprietary interfaces, we’re moving away from the point where clients control what they display and closer to the point where everything’s just a dumb-terminal for big business.

      We’re effectively backpeddling from Web 2.0 to Terrestrial TV.

    • Link@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Youtube most likely never made any money. Hosting these vast amounts of video is expensive. Google stopped telling us how much they money youtube made them lose. You would think they would start bragging when they could make a profit off of it.

      That being said, this still sucks of course.

      • naoseiquemsou@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Although they don’t profit directly from youtube, it’s a strategy they take to impede competition from arising and keeping their name as the main one. It’s the kind of strategy only multibillionaire companies can do, and, in my opinion, something that should be restricted, because it affects smaller businesses to the point of becoming inviable.

        • Zifnab25@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          More notably, its a strategy they can do when borrowing costs are functionally zero.

          A lot of this shit is just the consequence of Fed Rate Policy. No more cheap money means these loss leaders are actually being expected to generate profit, not to just act as clearing houses for propaganda.

  • waspentalive@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    As fill-in ads are a vector for computer viruses and other malware I for one will NOT be disabling my ad blocker unless YouTube is willing to provide a lifetime subscription to something like Life Lock and make me whole for anything lost to whatever malware arrives as a part of an ad.

    Where else can I watch sci-show, Linus-tech-tips, and all the other channels I subscribe to?

    • PeterPoopshit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      This is why I download so many YouTube videos. This is why I have a complicated video tags and search system (I’ll put it on github eventually).

      Some day it’s going to get taken away and I’m not watching those trashy ads. I’d watch a non-obnoxious 15-30 second ad every 30 minutes but they want us to watch 2 minutes of unskippable full-r*tard annoying trash every 5 minutes and I will not cooperate with that in any way shape or form.

      I think a reasonable ad system is that thing where YouTubers do that sponsorship thing and make it part of the video then you can skip it if it sucks.

    • beatniak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Just use newpipe. It’s youtube without the ads. Doesn’t have casting support, but it allows you to download the videos. You can also listen/download to the audio of videos, without fetching the video.

      • blank_sl8@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Newpipe will probably be blocked as well if youtube is doing this. Honestly not sure why youtube hasn’t blocked yt-dlp and others already.

          • dogmuffins@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            this particular cat and mouse has been going on for a long time.

            Although I get the impression it’s not particularly aggressive.

            There was a while there about a year ago where newpipe seemed to break every week and you had to install the next patch version from github. It’s not like newpipe had to develop some new workaround or something, just changed class names or something.

  • manned_meatball@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    oh boy, I wish youtube kills itself like reddit is doing right now so decentralized alternatives can become widely adopted

    • PureTryOut@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Newpipe or even better, LibreTube, for even more privacy (and included sponsorblock!).

    • Petri@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Damn straight - they can take my NewPipe from my cold dead hands :-)

    • hugz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The great thing about using free open-source software is the immunity from corporate shenanigans.

      • datendefekt@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Well, all the open-source Reddit clients are pretty drastically affected by Reddit’s shenanigans.

        • hugz@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          RedReader isn’t actually. Reddit granted them an exemption, partially because it’s FOSS

  • LostCause@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    When will companies finally understand that some people won‘t watch ads no matter what tricks they employ. I‘d rather watch no video at all than a single ad. If that is their goal, fine.

  • Landor Dragen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    YouTube is the only Google service I use on a regular basis. Happy to leave them behind if they continue with this type of behavior.

    It would be less convenient, but it is what it is and if there’s one thing I can’t stand, it’s ads.

  • dan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Then I’m going to begin not fucking watching YouTube.

    • kadu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      There is a federated version of YouTube…

      But storing video is a massive challenge, way harder than dealing with a Lemmy or Mastodon instance.

      • dan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        My rational mind realises it’s such an expensive system to run that it’s reasonable for them to charge or show ads. The problem is they’ve been extremely aggressive with ads and pushing subscriptions, to the point where I’m pretty resentful of the idea. Plus they’ve neglected so many things (like allowing aggressive copyright predators and refusing to implement sensible human-based appeals processes) that they really should have dealt with and instead embraced an algorithm that I’m pretty sure is at least partially responsible for the radicalisation of large groups of people.

        I… don’t mind paying for shit. I just don’t want to give them money.

        Also: wow there’s federated video sharing? Bet that’s not cheap to run.

      • Banzai51@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        The federated version also breaks one of YouTube’s bigger strengths: Just browsing for something interesting.

  • Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    We did the Twitter to Mastodon migration. Now we are doing the Reddit to Lemmy/kbin migration. When are we doing the YouTube to Peertube migration?

  • androidul@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    They already get a lot of 💰from ad revenue, charging for a subscription just made that revenue even bigger.

    It’s possible they’re losing some coins here and there from the ad revenue that they’ve become so aggressive 😆