- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
The authors argue that centuries of imperialism, extractive capitalism, and population growth have pushed Earth’s ecosystems beyond their limits, and created a broadening pattern of social inequality. The review summarizes the grave threats facing the planet but rejects a “doom and gloom” philosophy. Instead, the authors argue, the threats should motivate swift and substantial actions.
According to the authors, a global economic model focused on wealth accumulation and profit, rather than true sustainability, is a major impediment to decarbonization, conserving natural resources, and ensuring social equity. Therefore, the authors argue, governments should enforce radical, immediate cuts in fossil fuel use, eliminate environmentally harmful subsidies, and restrict trade that generates pollution or unsustainable consumption.
What is the empirical process these scientists used for determining what the human race collectively ought to do?
Why not read the study?
I threw it in ChatGPT for a summary as a curiosity but I know without reading that the scientists are beyond their qualifications in trying to presuppose why they are seeing what they are seeing and are well beyond in supposing how we could or should solve it. Much less why.
deleted by creator
I’m not defending a thesis. I’m talking to nerds on Lemmy that already have their mind made up about pretty much everything. A summary from ChatGPT is the appropriate time investment.
It’s never nice to discover that what you’ve been told your whole life - was just capitalist propaganda…