3volver@lemmy.world to General Discussion@lemmy.world · 7 months agoDoes this plan make sense? v2lemmy.worldimagemessage-square380fedilinkarrow-up11.1Karrow-down1105
arrow-up1994arrow-down1imageDoes this plan make sense? v2lemmy.world3volver@lemmy.world to General Discussion@lemmy.world · 7 months agomessage-square380fedilink
minus-squareelrik@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·7 months agoAgreed, although ranked choice with some form or proportional allocation instead of “single winner take all” might be even better.
minus-squareCaptainProton@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-27 months agoThat would mean electing parties and the parties choosing the specific candidates. That works until party interests are so entrenched that you cannot get any new representation without standing up an entire new party.
minus-squaresep@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 months agoSounds like scandinavia. We have new parties all the time. parties must deal with the others to make a coalition that will govern together.
Agreed, although ranked choice with some form or proportional allocation instead of “single winner take all” might be even better.
That would mean electing parties and the parties choosing the specific candidates. That works until party interests are so entrenched that you cannot get any new representation without standing up an entire new party.
Sounds like scandinavia. We have new parties all the time. parties must deal with the others to make a coalition that will govern together.