Two of the three victims specifically singled out by the New York Times in a marquee exposé published in December, which alleged that Hamas had deliberately weaponized sexual violence during the October 7 attacks, were not in fact victims of sexual assault, according to the spokesperson for the Kibbutz Be’eri, which the Times identified as the location of the attack.

The Times article described three alleged victims of sexual assault for whom it reported specific biographical information. One, known as the “woman in the black dress,” was Gal Abdush. Some of her family members have contested the claims made by the Times. The other two alleged victims were unnamed teenage sisters from Kibbutz Be’eri whose precise ages were listed in the New York Times, making it possible to identify them.

When asked about the claims made by the New York Times, Paikin independently raised their name. “You’re talking about the Sharabi girls?” she said. “No, they just — they were shot. I’m saying ‘just,’ but they were shot and were not subjected to sexual abuse.” Paikin also disputed the graphic and highly detailed claims of the Israeli special forces paramedic who served as the source for the allegation, which was published in the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, and other media outlets. “It’s not true,” she told The Intercept, referring to the paramedic’s claims about the girls. “They were not sexually abused.”

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Since that UN report is citing Zaka (40 beheaded babies) as a “credible source,” it is indeed complete propaganda.

    New breaking points video debunking this report with an important takeaway:

    The UN is not a monolith. There are certain employees fully willing to spread certain narratives, and this is one of them.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Long story short, there’s no new substantive evidence beyond what the NYT already said? And considering how badly the NYT fucked up with their recent poll, I’m even more inclined than before to doubt their story.

        • Zeroxxx@lemmy.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          8 months ago

          Truth what? Faking rape is not good, denying true rape case is even worse. Fucking moron.

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Tell the IDF to stop faking rape claims then. They told us back in November they had mountains of forensic evidence and thousands of witnesses. And now they can’t find a single CCTV recording and they lost the forensic evidence? They can’t even find two “witnesses” which corroborate a story.

            Until you find evidence it’s rather obvious these are nothing but lies to manufacture consent for the Genocide of Gaza.

                • Zeroxxx@lemmy.id
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Who said about thousand? Know your place.

                  This garbage far left keeps spouting nonsense.

                  ‘Hamas never raped anyone. Yes I believe that.’

                  There now satisfied?

                  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    If people say you raped someone would you like them to present evidence?

                    Especially if their claims keep getting proven false showing that actually no rape happened. Stooping so low to use Zaka as a source for their claims.

                    Would you accept it if people just randomly started calling you a rapist too?