• fullmetalScience
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well, during the entire simulation not one higher tier trickster expressly stated what it would be “effective” at - or whom it would be “safe” for. “Safe” … from being accepted by the reasonable, maybe.

    • nabio
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      imagine trusting the government, corporations, bigpharma, the “science”, bigtech and the news…

      there are good things about what happened anyway, now a lot of people look back and notice it was like a scam, kind of a scam or at least overreacted. I would say the number % people who question injections are at the highest it has ever been, same as those who now don’t trust the news, the “science” etc. Now irl I hear common people talk about how the news manipulate people with headlines like “a study says” “scientists say” “experts say”. I think this is great, it wasn’t like that years ago. Obviously no matter what some people will continue to willingly take as many shots as the govt and tv tell them to take, don’t forget there’s sort of a religious side of the “science”, like a modern religion. But it seems to me there’s also people noticing science is more like scientism, a manipulation tool, a tool to control the masses like any previous religion.

  • fullmetalScience
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    FWIW you can debunk the Bluetooth myth by firing up bluetoothctl in monitoring mode having an iPhone either on or turned off.

    iPhone being iPhone, even with Bluetooth “off” it will announce seemingly random MAC addresses (prefixes registered to Apple).

    In my test only turning off the device removed the MAC addresses. It was an old device, so somebody would have to check if current devices will still go radio silent.