• 3volver@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    You clearly misunderstand proportionality. You keep referring to the raw number of representatives they have without factoring in their population. I’d be surprised if you’ve ever passed a mathematics class in your entire life.

    • Melkath@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      You’re just being willfully moronic now.

      You are 1 person with 54 representatives in congress, 52 in House, 2 in Senate.

      I am 1 person with 8 representatives in congress, 6 in House, 2 in Senate.

      A) You have more federal representation than me.

      B) That is exactly how the system was designed. To have 2 bodies in congress, one population based, and one not. It was designed that way for a reason.

      What a knuckle dragging fucking idiot you are.

        • Melkath@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Just because you don’t understand federal civics and checks and balances doesn’t mean you deserve EVEN MORE control over the rest of the nation.

      • 3volver@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Each 1 Wyoming voter is worth about 67 Californians in the senate due to the fact that California has about 67 times the population but still only 2 senators.

        38,940,231 Californians / 576,851 Wyomingites = ~67.5 ratio

        • Melkath@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          And that is what the house is for, dipshit.

          The Senate is to check an overpopulated state from having complete control over the other 49 states and whatever amount of territories or whatever we are calling them.

          Seriously dude. Try rubbing 2 brain cells together.