(yes, I also see that it says Chinease)

  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    Anyone who even compares a for profit corportation to the world’s largest hostile militaristic dictatorship is an idiot. Both bad, but on completely different scales.

    • squash_squash@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      US looks very militaristic to me. It has a very broken democracy, and a history of supporting/causing brutal dictatorships.

      • seejur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The control the Chinese gov has over tiktok is on a different scale compared to Google and the US

        • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          Just to play devil’s advocate here, how many military bases has China got in other countries, compared to the US?

          • wieson@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            How many McDonald’s are there compared to general tso’s chicken?

            Both comparisons are irrelevant. It is about how much control and access China/US have over tiktok/Google and the user data and algorithms.

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        The USA hasn’t taken territory since 1946.

        The major reason for the USA being so broken is due to deregulation and corporate greed. Which is a little different in nuance to Authoritarian China.

        • Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          The US doesn’t try. It just bombs the fuck out of anyone worth exploiting production of anything any private exploitator willing to play “business” there wants.

            • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Ghastly business, that. Unavoidable, really, and tragic. Anyways, here’s our top stories tonight: the US kills its own population with the most potent designer drugs in history, at a 0% tax revenue! “This is great for the economy”, according to Experts, who warn that the same measures would be “devastating” under Democratic rule.

        • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          “Um, technically when we lost all those wars for profit and oil, we didn’t seize any land. So, technically, we are the good guys.”

          • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Compared to the dictatorship who are in the process of seizing land and committing genocides on their (according to them) own peoples, yes the USA are fucking saints. See this is my exact problem, two bad things are not equivalent but so many people fail to grasp that.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The things the CCP could do with political blackmail gathered from tiktok would make even Zuck blush.

      • xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        At the very least, Google and Facebook have to step back if caught. Meanwhile, Chinese companies often don’t care about EU privacy laws. Still avoid them altogether, any way.

        • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Do they? They’ve been caught BIG TIME, and META stock price is at an ATH!

          Living like a street criminal for a decade sure puts international politics in perspective, because you can just see straight through the bullshit. It’s just bigger numbers, but the principles and human behavior stays 100% the same.

          • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Meta was sued in India, Brazil, the UK, and the USA for the way they sold data in the 2010s, being fined Billions of dollars total. In July 2019 they were fined 5 Billion in a 3 to 2 vote by the FTC and they’re in the process of a 20 year settlement plan.

            Meta also has a proposed trial date for December against the FTC and 46 states after their supposedly unlawful and aggressive mergers to acquire WhatsApp and Instagram, called Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms, Inc. (formerly Federal Trade Commission v. Facebook, Inc.). The Mergers are why their evaluation keeps rising.

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I bet from reading message history they have tons of SSNs and bank details. Probably even information about our military.

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m honestly more worried about them knowing details on politicians and their families. The most they can do with some rando’s personal info is send them targeted propaganda. Knowing a handful of republican congressmen has lgbq relatives can be used to make them to shift policies.

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        As much as China is a festering cancer upon the world, I am willing to bet that for every single trademark horror that is taking place in their society, I could find a match or worse in the USA.

    • PurplebeanZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Thank you, this is my viewpoint exactly. We are exploited by both but one is after money, the other is a threat.

        • VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s like saying that Putin couldn’t hurt anyone outside of Russia yet he’s had multiple people killed in foreign countries.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Most of us are boring. We’re not oligarchs or investigative reporters, nor hold key posts in government or industry, nor are connected to dissenters. It’s not that he couldn’t but it’s almost impossible to see a scenario where either dictator would have an interest in most of us. I neither control anything they want nor block their way to it

          • andy_wijaya_med@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Nope. But how can an average TikTok user in USA be threatened by China? Concretely/ literally?

            I honestly think that Trump is a much greater threat to average American than using TikTok.

        • markon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Usually they can’t, but they can blackmail. Usually only if you’re really really deep in anti Pooh territory though. Pooh is vindictive and thin skinned like our spray tan guy. Spray tan could for example, work with Pooh to surveil and jail dissenters. It’s not that China is a threat to an individual American or other foreigner in a Western country per se, but as long as they could potentially leverage your data against you they do have a little threat. For the record Pooh and spray tan should be sent to an island together to… Oh shit nvm usually rich people and islands aren’t a good thing. 😂

          • andy_wijaya_med@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            If you’re someone influential enough to be blackmailed by the Chinese government and you’re using TikTok… You’re really stupid… but average TikTok user, really has nothing to be afraid of China, I think. TikTok is also after money, as far as I know (ads). They are a company. Like Huawei, they might have a close relationship with the Chinese government, similar with Google with the US government.

    • pbbp [tous, any]@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I doythink those are as different as you say. Through the Patriot Act, american corporate spying is US spying.

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Okay but one wants to efficiently sell me worthless trash and the other would happily kill me and take my property given an opportunity, so…

          • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            That’s fair but I feel like it’s not in Google’s best interests to collect your photos library, clipboard, message history, contacts info, SSN, banking details, etc and then sell all of it to China for cheap. The extent of Data Collection, and the very obvious malicious intent of it, embedded in TikTok sets it worlds apart.

        • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          The US has actively used that kind of info to extrajudically kill people, we know that for sure. We don’t know if China actually did that (they probably did).

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Now look you here- one party is a convicted serial rapist, the other party is elitist.

      They’re both criminals.

      So it doesn’t matter.

      Which is why you should vote for convicted serial rapist party.

      Nobody likes an elitist.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      While they’re at completely different scales, plus will go to much different lengths to abuse what they find out, It comes down to personal peril. I know exactly how Google will use that surveillance data to my detriment and that they’ll openly sell it to more nefarious entities, however I fail to see how the Chinese government would ever have an interest in my data or in selling it.

      I don’t use Tik Tok or Huawei, but that’s for other reasons

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You fail to see why they would collect the massive amounts of data that they’ve been repeatedly proven to collect? Sounds like willful ignorance, to me.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not at all. I understand storage and scaling are cheap, so it’s a great strategy to collect every piece of data about every person. Then you use whatever you need, whenever you need to.

          For example, it’s expensive to investigate a Congressman’s past to find that picture in drag for blackmail. It’s much cheaper to collect everything you can so once he becomes a Congressman you can simply search for connections and seconds later have that picture off his college buddy’s computer