Sort of. But people in society CAN act in solidarity. It’s obviously unlikely (something tech CEO’s calculated in these layoffs).
Obviously, capitalist exceptionalism is going to cause them not to do this. No one wants to loan their neighbor some money to weather a strike that WILL eventually lift ALL BOATS because of the whole “fuck you, got mine” vibe of EVERYONE in cutthroat capitalist societies. If I had the money, I’d certainly take part in this kind of collective action…and I’d also argue that many tech workers can because they were paid INCREDIBLY well in comparison to most trades…but you and I know they won’t.
I’m a member of a stagehand union that will NEED to strike during the summer (our busiest season) in order to gain some ground back from what price gouging, austerity, and inflation has taken from us. I can easily guess how likely the membership will be to endorse a strike when we will have been out of work for more than a year when negotiations start. That doesn’t make what I said less true; just about as unlikely as a third power coming to power in the United States two party electoral system.
Agreed. But it does allow people to finally come to the understanding that agreeing to play by their rules of civility (censoring calls to action, for example) will never get us the freedom we seek and represents tacit support of that oppressive system.
Until those that finally put in the effort to organize past the censored calls to action get led around by the nose of some controlled opposition “grassroots” bullshit that is still meant to ensure nothing really changes
The interesting part of all this to me is that it makes me wonder if religious centers will find new life in this context — being places where non-family support each other financially during collective action.
I’m not talking mega churches here, but community churches, mosques and synagogues that still exist within suburban communities.
They already are. That’s part of what makes religion so difficult to excise.
They’re filling an ancient psychological social need, and we already know many will stay members of cults they know are false due to the community and perceived social support it provides.
Sort of. But people in society CAN act in solidarity. It’s obviously unlikely (something tech CEO’s calculated in these layoffs).
Obviously, capitalist exceptionalism is going to cause them not to do this. No one wants to loan their neighbor some money to weather a strike that WILL eventually lift ALL BOATS because of the whole “fuck you, got mine” vibe of EVERYONE in cutthroat capitalist societies. If I had the money, I’d certainly take part in this kind of collective action…and I’d also argue that many tech workers can because they were paid INCREDIBLY well in comparison to most trades…but you and I know they won’t.
I’m a member of a stagehand union that will NEED to strike during the summer (our busiest season) in order to gain some ground back from what price gouging, austerity, and inflation has taken from us. I can easily guess how likely the membership will be to endorse a strike when we will have been out of work for more than a year when negotiations start. That doesn’t make what I said less true; just about as unlikely as a third power coming to power in the United States two party electoral system.
deleted by creator
I agree with you but let’s not pretend that that’s not entirely BY DESIGN.
It being intentional or not doesn’t change the situation for those stuck in it
Agreed. But it does allow people to finally come to the understanding that agreeing to play by their rules of civility (censoring calls to action, for example) will never get us the freedom we seek and represents tacit support of that oppressive system.
Until those that finally put in the effort to organize past the censored calls to action get led around by the nose of some controlled opposition “grassroots” bullshit that is still meant to ensure nothing really changes
The interesting part of all this to me is that it makes me wonder if religious centers will find new life in this context — being places where non-family support each other financially during collective action.
I’m not talking mega churches here, but community churches, mosques and synagogues that still exist within suburban communities.
They already are. That’s part of what makes religion so difficult to excise.
They’re filling an ancient psychological social need, and we already know many will stay members of cults they know are false due to the community and perceived social support it provides.