While some accounts have been suspended, many posts remain live.

Sexually explicit AI-generated images of Taylor Swift have been circulating on X (formerly Twitter) over the last day in the latest example of the proliferation of AI-generated fake pornography and the challenge of stopping it from spreading.

X’s policies regarding synthetic and manipulated media and nonconsensual nudity both explicitly ban this kind of content from being hosted on the platform.

  • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
    6·
    10 months ago

    I’m not the one who claimed they were off topic. I’m the one who was right about generative " art " being a god-damn scam. Easy mistake to make I suppose.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      3·
      10 months ago

      All analogies eventually fail when you dig into them far enough, by nature of what an analogy is. That is, an analogy is not exactly identical to the thing being analogized. If you want to be able to use analogies but refuse to acknowledge that they eventually lose relevance when you stretch them too far then you’re simply not amenable to reason.

      And then you go and explicitly beg the very question under debate with an “of course I’m right.” No, AI art isn’t a “scam,” whatever you mean by that.