Initially, LinkedIn was just another site where you could find jobs. It was simple to use, simple to connect with others; it even had some friendly groups with meaningful discussions.

And then it gained monopoly as the “sole” professional network where you could actually land a job. If you are not on LinkedIn now, you are quite invisible in the job market. Recruiters are concentrated there, even if they have to pay extremely high prices for premium accounts. The site is horrible now: a social network in disguise, toxic and boring influencers, and a lot of noise and bloated interface to explore.

When Google decided to close their code.google.com, GitHub filled a void. It was a simple site powered by git (not by svn or CVS), and most of the major open-source projects migrated there. The interface was simple, and everything was perfect. And then something changed.

GitHub UI started to bloat, all kinds of “features” nobody asked for were implemented, and then the site became a SaaS. Now Microsoft hosts the bulk of open-source projects the world has to offer. GitHub has become a monopoly. If you don’t keep your code there, chances are people won’t notice your side projects. This bothers me.

Rant over. I hate internet monopolies.

  • rist097@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Advantage of Github over Gitlab is code discoverability. My organization hosts Gitlab instance but I would still rather host my open source project on Github instead, because its impossible to collaborate on Gitlab with external users who dont have an account on our instance.

    Once there is a federation feature similar to Lemmy, I would be happy to host everything there.

    • Jack3G@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This could be what you’re looking for. Their main implementation is a gitea fork, but I’ve seen mentions of gitlab as well. Unfortunately I don’t think github would ever consider being compatible, that would just lose them users.

      • rist097@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks. There is also a Gitlab issue requesting this feature, which I am tracking.

        It needs to reach a polished state before organizations and university adapt it. So something like what you linked probably wont fly.

    • MagicalVagina@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can use Gitlab exactly the same as GitHub though if you use the hosted Gitlab. I have multiple of my open source projects on Gitlab.com and everyone can access.

      • rist097@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well not really, you would need an account in the organization in order to create issues, pull requests for a privately hosted instance. You can see the public repository but apart from cloning you cannot do anything else.

        While Gitlab.com is centrally hosted, not much different than Github, you still cannot communicate with other Gitlab hosted servers.

        • MagicalVagina@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah yes this I agree. But it’s not like it’s different on GitHub. I guess I got confused because you said “Advantage of Github over Gitlab is code discoverability.”.
          While no it’s the same? There is no advantage for GitHub