What’s the reasoning behind not having a “system tray” in GNOME? You need to install an extension for that, and that is a weird process for newcomers/beginners.

But my question is why? Does GNOME really think you don’t need one? Why don’t they include it?

  • beta_tester@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    keys and numbers (also have a shared terminal shortcut since I use conemu/cmder on windows), and the overview will block

    Meta+Numbers work on 45

    GNOME extensions should be more accessible, KDE is a good (not perfect) example for this. If GNOME extensions were more accessible, the design choices wouldn’t matter too much. Since when are we dealing with extensions and extension manager and neither is installed by default on most OSs.

    • Vik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      True, they work regardless. DTP keeps a consistent look across my desktops, and I agree that having to install third party extensions is perhaps not ideal to reach that, but I was catering to a specific use case. I didn’t mean to suggest that I dont find stock gnome to be a perfectly servicable DE.

      In any case, the overview at login is still obstructive for my workflow, and I’ve resorted to disabling that with yet another extension.

      I did try plasma 5.27 and 6 (fedora 40 rawhide) very recently. Can appreciate all the functionality it offers but maybe it goes a but too far. I found it sort of busy, the config menus were disorienting, and I found myself tweaking that ootb experience more than with gnome.