• Candelestine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Atrophied…? It’s a private company that NASA helped fund to help develop their own, independent capabilities. The private sector is always less careful, this should not be surprising.

    There’s a whole different private American company launching their own attempt next month or something.

    There’s more lenses to look through asides the lens of nationalism.

    • filoria@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      A government-funded project, carrying a government-funded payload, launched by a government-funded rocket.

      bUt ItS pRiVaTe

      • athos77@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        So by that logic, if the government charters a bus to carry some government scientists and their government-funded research projects to a conference that the government has partially funded, and the bus crashes on the way to the conference, then the government is responsible for the bad brakes on the bus? How does that make sense?

        • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The government has given at least one direct or indirect subsidy to OP, so therefore anything OP does wrong can be blamed on the government! Hooray!

        • filoria@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          If the bus manufacturer and bus operator is funded by the government, absolutely.

        • hglman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah because the government is responsible for road saftey…

      • Candelestine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Put some in front of each of those for actual accuracy. NASA does have projects it exclusively funds and controls.

        Those are not without failure either, of course, the Challenger disaster being a classic example. Details are important, at any rate.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        More whaling for capital. “Won’t someone think of the shareholders!”

        The part that broke was built by a private company that took taxpayer dollars soo…. Seems like the free market is what failed here

      • FellowArmadello
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, yes it is pRiVaTe. Any other non logical statements you want to make?