Pressure grows on artificial intelligence firms over the content used to train their products

‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says::Pressure grows on artificial intelligence firms over the content used to train their products

  • AntY@lemmy.worldEnglish
    564·
    10 months ago

    The main difference between the two in your analogy, that has great bearing on this particular problem, is that the machine learning model is a product that is to be monetized.

    • BURN@lemmy.worldEnglish
      31·
      10 months ago

      Also an “AI” is not human, and should not be regulated as such

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.worldEnglish
            12·
            10 months ago

            I don’t think it is. We have all these non-human stuff we are awarding more rights to than we have. You can’t put a corporation in jail but you can put me in jail. I don’t have freedom from religion but a corporation does.

            • BURN@lemmy.worldEnglish
              2·
              10 months ago

              Corporations are not people, and should not be treated as such.

              If a company does something illegal, the penalty should be spread to the board. It’d make them think twice about breaking the law.

              We should not be awarding human rights to non-human, non-sentient creations. LLMs and any kind of Generative AI are not human and should not in any case be treated as such.

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.worldEnglish
                12·
                10 months ago

                Corporations are not people, and should not be treated as such.

                Understand. Please tell Disney that they no longer own Mickey Mouse.

                • BURN@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  1·
                  10 months ago

                  Again, I literally already said that it’s a problem.

                  IP law is also different than granting rights to corporations. Corporations SHOULD be allowed to own IP, provided they’ve compensated the creator.

    • S410@lemmy.mlEnglish
      1120·
      10 months ago

      Not necessarily. There’s plenty that are open source and available for free to anyone willing to provide their own computational power.
      In cases where you pay for a service, it could be argued that you aren’t paying for the access to the model or its results, but the convenience and computational power necessary to run the model.