They’re blaming customers for not having good cybersecurity practices instead of themselves for not having good cybersecurity practices.

  • The Bard in Green@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    From a PSA stand point, 23andMe makes a really good point here.

    From a Legal / Responsible Data Custodian perspective, it’s the same collective responsibility bullshit that the oil industry likes to shit out about climate change.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        The issue isn’t just reuse of passwords. Only about 14,000 accounts were breached because of bad passwords. The problem is that those 14k accounts allowed bad actors to access the personal information of nearly 7 million people. It’s less “you shouldn’t have reused your password,” it’s more “your neighbor’s cousin’s sister-in-law’s nephew shouldn’t have reused his password”

        • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          … And you should not opt in to sharing data with people whose security practices you don’t know.

          Don’t print your SSN and give it to your inlaws or your grandma. Or your credit card info or anything else.

    • GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      While it’s not the point 23andMe wants to make here, it is an absolutely horrible idea to allow a company to access, catalog and sell your DNA information. Shame they didn’t touch on that point.