• null@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Oh, that’s easy – that’s utter bullshit. Article is generous, this is a blog post.

      • null@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Because I’m pretty active in the Nix community and have never seen a single anti-flakes comment anywhere. Plenty of people advocating for flakes, and those who don’t use or understand flakes. But never anyone who actively dislikes them.

        • parens@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          OK, I see where you’re coming from. You’re interpreting “anti” as “dislike”. Have you considered interpreting it as those who don’t use and don’t want to use flakes?

          Just because there is disagreement, doesn’t mean that it has to be tied to negative emotions like hate or dislike.

          • null@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Well no, because that’s not what “anti” means.

            And one can absolutely use NixOS without using flakes, whether they’re marked experimental or not. They’re simply a way to make inputs declarative, rather than the nix-channel method which is imperative.

            So there’s no “disagreement” here either.