cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/1332080

downvoting everything i disagree with seems excessive and unhealthy, considering i can just ignore and move on. Beehaw doesn’t have downvotes at all, reasoning that you can ignore it and move on or report it, and it seems to work fine for them. i do think downvotes have a use though, i’m just not sure what it is. what do you all think?

  • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I generally use it for “you’re a twat” in general-discussion posts, or “that’s actually misleading people” in factual-resource posts. Stuff that doesn’t warrant reporting, but I feel should be discouraged nonetheless, by my own personal standards.

    Shit takes, unpleasant ideology, aggrieved stupidity, a senseless waste of perfectly good electrons, etc.

    It is the crow of jugdement staring back at them.

    Disagreeing is fine; I can disagree with people all day and not downvote them over it. Being wrong about stuff doesn’t make someone an asshole. However, being an asshole about stuff does frequently make people wrong, which is where the confusion may lie.

    • HelixDab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Depends on the disagreement. “I don’t like shoes that have separate toes”. Yeah, okay, that’s your choice, I love my VFFs anyways. “I think Jews should be murdered”, no, sorry, you don’t get to have an opinion about the rights of other people to exist and occupy space.

    • kjetil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I think of downvotes as crowdsourced moderation:

      Posts made in bad faith, with a toxic attitude or wildly offtopic get a downvote