If Ukraine is able to replace or recover damaged vehicles why is Zelensky still asking for more tanks (in Switzerland right now)? I thought the sanctions were going to trigger massive inflation and unrest in the Russian economy and their desire to support the war would disappear. I thought the Russians were out of ammunition last year and now they’re bombing relentlessly. I though their morale was so low they were going to capitulate when this attack happened, yet their first main line of defensive trenches hasn’t yet been touched. If Ukraine morale is high and Russian morale is low why are Ukrainians surrendering or refusing to fight on the front lines?

Austin told us all that he had high expectations for the counter-offensive two days before the Pentagon leaks revealed there were actually low expectations. Why believe the boy who already cried wolf, especially when his words don’t align with reality? There’s been too much lying. The war is costing too much in terms of tax payer dollars and Ukrainian lives. This Biden administration is stuck is a sunk cost fallacy and needs to stop.

  • andrai@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    More tanks are always good.

    The sanctions are working. But in a sense of turning Russia into a bigger NK or Iran. They don’t have inflation because they immediately restricted capital exchanges preventing any capital flight. They also increased their federal fund rate by a lot, which will prevent inflation but still hurt their economy.

    Russia is suffering from ammunition shortages, which is why they are firing much less compared to the start of the war.

    Ukraine made more progress in the last two weeks than Russia did in the last 6 months. It was always gonna be hard. Unlike with the Kharkiw counteroffensive Russia expects it and is dug in having built up defence in depth. It was always gonna be hard, specially in the early days. More like how the Kherson counteroffensive went which took over a month of heavy fighting to get going.

    I’m not aware of Ukrainians just surrendering and refusing to fight. To me it looks like they are fighting quite effectively so far.

    Lastly, if you are actually worried about the loss of Ukrainian live (which I doubt tbh) than maybe, just maybe you should instead support your Biden administration and encourage them to send more material so that Ukrainians can better defend themselves.

    • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      if you are actually worried about the loss of Ukrainian live (which I doubt tbh) than maybe, just maybe you should instead support your Biden administration and encourage them to send more material so that Ukrainians can better defend themselves.

      If you actually care about the loss of any lives (Ukranian and Russian), then you should not support any action which does not immediately end the war. Providing more ammunition causes more deaths (what is ammunition used for? they aren’t shooting trees, they’re shooting and killing humans). How can you not see how hypocritical it is to suggest that more arms would lead to less death?

      • andrai@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If the Russian soldier wants to survive he can just surrender or go home (although he might get shot by their own men).

        If the Ukrainian wants to survive, he has to drive the Russians out of his country.

        And you are right, I do not care whether the invaders survive or not. They decide to invade their peaceful neighbour to murder and rape the civilian population. Have you all forgotten Bucha already? I have not, and there are hundreds of Buchas in the occupied territories.

        Are you seriously telling Ukraine they should just let the Russians genocide and rape them in peace instead of fighting for their survival? That’s a sickening take.

        • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If the Russian soldier wants to survive he can just surrender or go home (although he might get shot by their own men).

          If the Ukrainian wants to survive, he has to drive the Russians out of his country.

          This is nonsense. Russia has not set out to kill every Ukranian. If the Ukranians stopped fighting back, Russia wouldn’t kill them all, they’d stop killing them in fact. I don’t understand how you think this is one-sided. As long as Ukraine is fighting back, they’re contributing to the loss of their own lives.

          Are you seriously telling Ukraine they should just let the Russians genocide and rape them

          Again, you’re acting like the goal is to genocide the Ukranian people. There’s literally nothing to indicate this.

          I’ll say it once more simply, but I doubt you care about logical consistency: Both Ukraine and Russia can end this war by stopping putting anything in to continuing it; as long as a party is continuing, and not stopping the war, that party is in part responsible for the loss of more human lives.

          • andrai@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Yes your Honor, it’s her fault I’m raping her. If she’d just consented I wouldn’t have to rape her!”

            Do you even listen to yourself?

          • automaton@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So you are basically saying that it’s Ukrainians’ fault that so many Russian lives are ended, because they could just stop fighting.

            And tell me, do you think Russia would ever stop attacking neighboring and sovereign countries, if this was the expected reaction?

            What are you, 6 years old?

            🤡

    • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Russia wil NEVER by a Iran or a North Korea, this is why precisely the sanctions failed horribly. With the size of Russia, they have a country that can almost autosustain itself, at least in the most basic of things, and they have infrastructure that was built by the Soviets, so they don’t have a country with great resources but now way to extract them (like Venezuela with oil, for example). Besides this, the US having sanction half of the Global South at this point doesn’t realise that we people from the third world are just going to give a fuck a start trading amongst us. Every step they give it’s easier, if Russia didn’t have an explicit reason to openly trade with Iran or North Korea, now they have. You’re just isolating from the world and the only allies you’ll be left off are a decaying Europe with no production and a decrepit fascist Empire, the US.

      • andrai@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Russia and China are already trading extensively with NK and Iran and have been for decades lol

        Iran also has a well industrialized economy, not unlike Russia and they will look quite similar once the western machinery that is extracting all those resources starts breaking down without being able to be replaced appropriately.

        Yes, you read right. All that machinery comes from decaying Europe and the decrepit US.

        • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, because there’s no other country on Earth, like maybe China, the world’s biggest producer that could potentially fix any of the machinery that only white people know how to build and repair, oh no, what are we going to do now!11!!! please saves us white saviour, we need your guidance because we are brutes.