It’s a common attitude, not just with reddit or phone apps, but just things in general. “I don’t have a problem with it, so why would anyone else?”
I remember when Arkham Knight came out, and it was a complete mess on PC. But it worked for enough people that anyone who talked about what a shitty port it was got shouted down.
A common problem I have with layouts, where there’s a common trend of leaving giant swathes of white space on either side of the content (in desktop aspect ratios, at least). Like with the new redesign of wikipedia, or even most fediverse sites. But many (if not most) people don’t really have a problem with it. I’ve even heard people talk about “having to move their head back and forth” to see content on the website. As though they’re incapable of moving their eyes in their sockets…
But that’s my own personal rant. In general, people are often hard-pressed to empathize with others these days. Not just in their use of social applications, but of most things in their lives.
I feel your rant, I really do.
You have no idea how disappointed I was after the Wikipedia redesign until I found the full width button in the bottom corner.
Most sites are optimized for mobile and are completely asinine looking on a monitor.
Especially text heavy sites where even a single sentence is broken into 2 or more lines, meanwhile 70% of the screen is empty.
And it’s not like it’s hard to implement a button like Wikipedia did, web designers just don’t give a crap.
I payed for a full monitor, let me use the full monitor!
Newspapers use every ounce of space they can, they don’t leave giant swathes of it bare. It’s not like there’s extra articles sitting along the side of the page… it’s just blank.
In fact, there’s often more white space on the sides of novel pages, depending on how they’re printed.
It’s a common attitude, not just with reddit or phone apps, but just things in general. “I don’t have a problem with it, so why would anyone else?”
I remember when Arkham Knight came out, and it was a complete mess on PC. But it worked for enough people that anyone who talked about what a shitty port it was got shouted down.
A common problem I have with layouts, where there’s a common trend of leaving giant swathes of white space on either side of the content (in desktop aspect ratios, at least). Like with the new redesign of wikipedia, or even most fediverse sites. But many (if not most) people don’t really have a problem with it. I’ve even heard people talk about “having to move their head back and forth” to see content on the website. As though they’re incapable of moving their eyes in their sockets…
But that’s my own personal rant. In general, people are often hard-pressed to empathize with others these days. Not just in their use of social applications, but of most things in their lives.
I feel your rant, I really do.
You have no idea how disappointed I was after the Wikipedia redesign until I found the full width button in the bottom corner.
Most sites are optimized for mobile and are completely asinine looking on a monitor.
Especially text heavy sites where even a single sentence is broken into 2 or more lines, meanwhile 70% of the screen is empty.
And it’s not like it’s hard to implement a button like Wikipedia did, web designers just don’t give a crap.
I payed for a full monitor, let me use the full monitor!
I’m curious, maybe an outdated question. But would you rather a newspaper be formatted like a novel?
Newspapers use every ounce of space they can, they don’t leave giant swathes of it bare. It’s not like there’s extra articles sitting along the side of the page… it’s just blank.
In fact, there’s often more white space on the sides of novel pages, depending on how they’re printed.