The threat suggests that Threads is the most serious rival yet to Elon Musk’s chaotic social platform.

  • wagesj45@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t believe that “240 character social media post” is somehow a trade secret. What are they expecting to tell the judge and not be laughed out of court?

    • moon_matter@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It might be possible to patent it. Look at Wizards of the Coast and all their crazy card game patents. But the only reason they were able to do that is because their patents are incredibly detailed and specific. So they could change it to 256 characters or something and be fine.

      • Madison_rogue@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        IIRC Threads is 500 characters, not 240, so that wouldn’t be a something they could sue over.

        However, Twitter has over 2000 patents filed, over 1400 of which are registered in the United States. They deal with malicious advertisement detection & remediation, malware, automatic management of data processing, mobile app management, interactive advertising, and electric publishing to name a few.

        I can see where Musk may have found similarities between the software somewhere in the mess of their patents.

        • bedrooms@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          But just how would they know the internals of Threads? According to Meta, even Twitter’s claim that Threads devs include ex-Twitter employees is wrong.

          To me it sounds like Twitter’s legal action is just an obstruction tactic.

      • bedrooms@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oof, imagine Twitter lawyers bringing in screen shots of their most salient code and SCOTUS TAKE THEM SERIOUSLY. Meta argues it’s silly and yet those judges establish that screenshots are the way to discuss software IP.