With localmonero shutting down, what would be the challenges of creating a federated version of localmonero? Traders and buyers can have accounts at different servers but still be able to trade each other and see each others’ listings.

The pros i can see are: It would be harder to stop without a single point of failure, and brave server maintainers can host their services in different jurisdictions to prevent legal troubles. And it would be very difficult to prosecute server admins, as they aren’t the creator but merely hosting a site.

  • eric2377
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think we have that already. It’s called ‘Haveno’.

    • aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Also, i’ve been on haveno. Seems like it’s more active in europe. It’s not as active in the US from what i can see.

      • Krugtron9000
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        This is like complaining that your new EV doesn’t have a large enough gasoline tank.

        Haveno is something much better than federated: it is decentralized.

        • aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          yeah, ok, cool. I was actually confused because I was already under the assumption that haveno was p2p decentralized and since you commented on my post, which was asking for a federated localmonero, that “we have that already: haveno” i got confused.