• mister_monster
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    I thought we already did authorship in alphabetical order so as to avoid any implied hierarchy?

      • drailin@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I thought I was hot shit with a low-priority B name, but the Adams in my collaboration showed me just how truly mid I am. If he wasn’t on my dissertation committee… and also a cool dude… and a good scientist…, I would have some choice words for him!

        • lugal@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Get rid of that guy! And you don’t have to do it alone. B names of the university, unite! You have nothing to lose but your second place and all the first places to gain

          • drailin@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’ll make him rue the day he was born. I will make the kerning on the copy of my dissertation I send him just slightly weird so that it gives him uncanny discomfort while reading it. Any plots I cite from his work will be slightly lower resolution. He won’t know what hit him.

    • MBM@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      They talk about alphabetical order in the introduction, you can see a bit of it in the screenshot. It feels just slightly unfair because you’ll always get Adams et al. and never Zimmer et al.