“…found a Reuters article which seems to be very unbiased”
I apologize, but if you think Reuters is unbiased, I am not sure what to tell you. We may simply disagree of have been exposed to different sets of information over the course of at least the past couple decades or so.
As for fact-checking in general, from Reuters or any of the other self-appointed arbiters of truth and censorship, check out Matt Taibbi, or things like the Twitter Files, or CTIL files, or any of a host of other exposes on exactly what fact checks like the Reuters one you linked are all about. The ‘truths’ we may all be clinging to as presented by the legacy press are not self-evident or honest, and psyops are absolutely in effect. Many security state (ex feds, acronym gov agencies, et al) have a revolving door between legacy media and social media companies and legitimately pay, blackmail and bully them to promote the content their state-backec and corporate-backed interests desire, and demote or censor the content it does not. Again, see Taibbi, Shellenberger, Gutentag, Greenwald, or any of a host of other outlets for proof of this, with receipts if you like. Or not.
Again, do as you will, and believe as you will, just leave me and mine out of it please.
“…found a Reuters article which seems to be very unbiased”
I apologize, but if you think Reuters is unbiased, I am not sure what to tell you. We may simply disagree of have been exposed to different sets of information over the course of at least the past couple decades or so.
Just one small bit of info directly related specifically to the Reuters Dowd fact check: https://nitter.net/MichaelAMoyer/status/1626419515692138499#m
As for fact-checking in general, from Reuters or any of the other self-appointed arbiters of truth and censorship, check out Matt Taibbi, or things like the Twitter Files, or CTIL files, or any of a host of other exposes on exactly what fact checks like the Reuters one you linked are all about. The ‘truths’ we may all be clinging to as presented by the legacy press are not self-evident or honest, and psyops are absolutely in effect. Many security state (ex feds, acronym gov agencies, et al) have a revolving door between legacy media and social media companies and legitimately pay, blackmail and bully them to promote the content their state-backec and corporate-backed interests desire, and demote or censor the content it does not. Again, see Taibbi, Shellenberger, Gutentag, Greenwald, or any of a host of other outlets for proof of this, with receipts if you like. Or not.
Again, do as you will, and believe as you will, just leave me and mine out of it please.