• Hexagon@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I believe these actions will make us stronger and deliver significant value for our shareholders

    Yeah, fuck people, it’s all about the shareholders

    • King@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you trying to tell us you care for your ceo and you expect the same from him? Lmfao

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s the alternative though, hire as many people as possible and fail?

      If you are losing market share and profits then something needs to change, if you can cut costs of that. It’s a ridiculously big number and incredibly unfortunate but it’s unrealistic to think it’d be anything else

    • Changetheview@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, one quarter of decreased profits. Sales for the same quarter are only down 20%.

      Another article says “The company still expects full-year net sales in a range between 23.2 billion euros and 24.6 billion euros, sticking to its forecast.”

      I understand that it’s sometimes necessary for companies to trim the fat. But with annual net sales still on track and the company making healthy profits for many quarters running, it sure sucks for those 14,000 people that one bad quarter is being used as the reason that they’ll no longer be able to pay their bills.

      https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2023/10/19/nokia-to-cut-up-to-14000-jobs-after-profit-plunges-.html

  • spudwart@spudwart.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remember, this isn’t because they’re at record losses, or that they’re breaking even.

    It’s literally because they’re not making enough profit.

    This is the freemarket system functioning as intended.

    A company can still be making money, still be above water, but decide their shareholders need to be even better off and they will decide they deserve money more than people struggling and making it by barely check-to-check.

  • zacharoid@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Still made a profit, but have to fire all you. Sorry, gotta keep Wall Street happy. Byeeeee

    • baatliwala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Nokia is not just a phone company, it is also a telecommunications equipment provider. IIRC both those departments are 2 separate companies. They set up towers, 5G hardware etc and that part of the company is basically B2B.

    • XTL@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a different company. They shuffled names around.

    • Welp_im_damned@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      They mainly make telecom equipment. Also the modern Nokia phones are made by a company called hmd global. Not Nokia proper.

  • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I had to check the date of the article, I thought it was one from 2013.

    But as I can see Nokia only laid off 10,000 in 2013, they surpassed themselves and lay off 14,000 this time.

  • Sygheil@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    69% is the number to decide in such businesses.

    Make your products indestructible again.

  • McWolke@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Last time I wanted to buy a smartphone from Nokia they didn’t even have a phone in the higher price segment. I think the highest was 500 Euro and the components were worse or only slightly better than my old phone. If they had better phones, I’d buy them.

    • JohnSwanFromTheLough@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think Nokias main business is phones these days but I may be wrong. I was under the impression it was telecommunications. Microwave wireless, networking equipment etc.

    • aicse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nokia is not making phones anymore. Those on the market are from HMD Global, a Chinese company which bought the brand name Nokia for mobile.

      • Krotiuz@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        HMD Global is a Finnish company, run by ex-Nokia executives. It’s pretty nuch the old Nokia, seperated enough to not bankrupt the original company if it goes bad.

        The phones are no more Chinese than Google and Apple.

        • Dremor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If I recall well the phone conception is done in China. The only Finn part is the company itself and its management.