• nivenkos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ideally MS would have done this by actually competing and growing the industry by funding thousands of new studios and experimental projects.

    Instead they’re just trying to turn existing, well-funded and developed games into exclusives, and handing billions to Bobby Kotick.

    • Hydroel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not a matter of money, they have the money pool to do both (and they do). It’s about controlling as much of the market as they can by killing all competition, just like they did on the OS market.

      • Defaced@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly, the Microsoft of the 90’s is still there, they’re just better at hiding it and I’m glad all of this is coming out to the public. Microsoft plays dirty, always has and always will.

  • tookmyname@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Would great if they spent all money making games instead of buying studios that pump out annual rehashes.

  • FantasticFox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It seems crazy, like Insomniac Games cost Sony $229M, so MSFT could have bought or built like 300 AAA studios for the price of ATVI.

    I just really don’t see how it is worth it.

  • Hydroel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a business strategy email shared internally, any company would spend enormous amounts of money if it means eradicating the competition.

    For us as customers, though, the more competition the better, it drives innovation up and prices down.

    • TheYang@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re right, that’s why capitalism needs oversight.

      I think Companies should be too afraid of punishments to ever say something like this out loud, let alone write it down.

      I mean, in Context the whole E-Mail is way less terrible than the headline (as is tradition) but if it were up to me, I’d still like to make toeing the line like that quite painful.