• werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    34 minutes ago

    Ok press the start button and slowly scan your penis, asshole and testicles. First apply included wax and pull forcefully and swiftly to remove hair.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Short answer, yes.

    Finding complex patterns in noisy data is an application that AI is actually well suited for. It still requires human follow-up. Anyway, human experts make mistakes in these areas as well. There is a good chance that a well designed AI could be more accurate.

  • nxn@biglemmowski.win
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Every passing day we delve deeper into this hole that is a cold technology driven world. Instead we really should be taking the time to share our outbreaks with friends and family.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Depends on the specificity and sensitivity of the test. Would have to be damn close to gold standards to justify. Company providing tech would need to be heavily regulated. Could be promising tech for sex workers if sensitivity was decent, but by time skin manifestations are present most of these are fairly far along.

  • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Honestly? I’ve leaked pics of those voluntarily, so curiously I’d be a-okay with this one.

  • Aisteru@lemmy.aisteru.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Honestly? Before the AI craze, I’d have said yes, because I believe AIs tailored to do one specific thing can outperform humans. Today? I’d rather not, as I could not let go of the thought that it might be somme shitty model quickly put together by the nephew of the CEO…

  • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Would I trust the accuracy of the output? No, but it might be a decent warning to get tested to make sure. Would I trust a company with pictures of my genitals attached to my identity? Certainly not an AI company.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I dunno, maybe the diagnosis is fine but the companies that run it are sure to save copies. I can just see databreaches now, “5 million stolen dick picks uploaded to dark web”. Complete with labelling of which ones are diseased though, so that’s a help.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Twitter is mostly verified dicks these days. That might be the better platform.

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I don’t think the app in the picture is driven by AI. Seems like a catalogue of questions. Probably to assess some situation by some standard procedure. I’d trust that. Regarding the AI apps mentioned below: I wouldn’t trust them at all. If my private parts start itching and I can’t make sense of it, I’d go to the doctor. At least if it’s serious. Or use Dr. Google if it’s not too bad.