• One Redditor tested Google’s Find My Device network against Apple’s Find My Network by shipping an AirTag and a Pebblebee tracker to a different state and tracking the package through the respective apps.
  • The Pebblebee Tracker struggled to provide location updates, while Apple’s AirTag consistently updated throughout the journey.
  • Google’s Find My Device network is still nascent and opt-in, limiting its effectiveness compared to Apple’s Find My Network. Google is reportedly working on improving its network’s speed and reliability.
  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because Google decided to make it opt-in and by default also to send data only in crowded places.

    They said it’s because they care about privacy. But because it’s Google and we all know they don’t care a bit about privacyI wonder instead if it’s because keeping track of billions of devices it’s expensive and requires many servers, so it’s a cost cutting measure

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Worst possible experience, not hardly. He mailed the thing and tried to track it, and it didn’t work. When I saw “worst possible experience” I expected a swat raid or something. This is 2024, and if all that goes wrong with a new tech gadget is that it doesn’t work, that’s literally a nothingburger. At least give us some battery explosions or something.

    Obligatory: https://biggaybunny.tumblr.com/post/166787080920/tech-enthusiasts-everything-in-my-house-is-wired

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Redditor uses service that no one really uses yet, resulting in competing service that everyone defaults to using being better.”

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      One of worlds largest companies, can’t even afford to fund a project to make it competitive and attract users to grow it.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I thought the whole reason for its usefulness (coverage) was that it wasn’t opt-in.

      • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        why? what does their device locator service have to do with your home network?

        I’m genuinely curious, because nothing from that service has anything to do with anything that might happen on your network

        • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          why?

          For the same reason that one might block ads or cookies, of course. I don’t want a third party corporation profiling the bluetooth devices in my house and selling data about me to advertizers.

          what does their device locator service have to do with your home network?

          Apple’s device locator service uses the internet to report device IDs and GPS coords to Apple.

          I’m genuinely curious, because nothing from that service has anything to do with anything that might happen on your network

          Ideally, that would be true. But device locators necessarily report their snooping using an internet connection, and if they’re on my home network when they do it then they’d associate my IP address with my location. That’s way more of my personal information than I want Apple to have.

          • ramble81@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            profiling the Bluetooth devices in my house

            Uh, I hope you’re banning anyone with an iPhone from even getting within 10 meters of your house. Because their phone could easily just grab a list of all BT MACs (or hell, even WiFi MACs) it finds and then transmits that with its current GPS coordinates via its cell network. Doesn’t even need your network at all. And your wireless devices have to transmit their MAC addresses to work even if their not in pairing mode.

          • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            According to Apple (and I’m sure people have already investigated it), location data is encrypted in such a way that only the owner of the device can read the transmitted location. So no, this isn’t going to “associate your IP address with your location”.

            Only you can see where your AirTag is. Your location data and history are never stored on the AirTag itself. Devices that relay the location of your AirTag also stay anonymous, and that location data is encrypted every step of the way. So not even Apple knows the location of your AirTag or the identity of the device that helps find it.

            (from https://www.apple.com/airtag/)