• slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    8 months ago

    they’ve created a drive powered by a “New Force” outside our current known laws of physics, giving the propellant-less drive enough boost to overcome gravity.

    Right…

    • warmaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s true. Here’s a copy of their research paper:

      Sure, here’s what your research paper could look like:

      Title: Unveiling a Novel Force: Propelling Beyond Gravitational Constraints

      Abstract: This paper investigates a newly hypothesized force that enables propellant-less drives to defy gravity. Examining experimental anomalies and theoretical speculations, it explores potential mechanisms and applications, signaling a transformative leap in space exploration and transportation technology.

      But as an AI model, I don’t know shit and come up with bullshit out of my synthetic ass.

      • Murdoc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        Ikr? It already comes in four different flavours! (Five if you count the Star Wars Edition, but that was just a marketing gimmick.)

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      Obviously Buhler’s claims are pretty “woah, if true,” but the history of propellant-less drives is filled with seemingly positive results that are eventually dashed upon the rocks of scientific reality.

      “Big if true”

      • decerian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        8 months ago

        Gravity and vacuum are not mutually exclusive - you always have to deal with gravity forces, although they become negligible pretty quickly when you get into and then leave orbits.

        As to the specific claim, I suspect that the experiments they are currently doing (in vacuum chambers on earth) have gotten to the point that they are measuring the propulsion system producing more thrust than it’s own weight (T/W >1), which would technically be enough thrust to overcome gravity. Even if it wasn’t practically useful for actually getting to orbit, that amount of thrust on a reactionless motor would be incredible, and would totally unlock the solar system for us.

        • sushibowl@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          they become negligible pretty quickly when you get into and then leave orbits.

          You’re not wrong, but it’s worth noting that in low earth orbit (e.g. typical ISS orbiting altitude) earth’s gravity is still 90% as strong as at sea level. Astronauts on the ISS are weightless not because they escaped earth’s gravity, but because they’re continuously falling.

          • HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            If I remember right that is the slang term for a device used to simulated high force situations astronauts are expected to experience. So named for the frequent effect

              • Fuck spez@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                It’s so much more interesting than the parent comment makes it out to be, though. In case you didn’t already read anything about it, it’s an ordinary (on the outside) jet that flies in parabolic arcs which at a certain point lets the passengers experience microgravity and float around the modified cabin for a minute or so at a time. Anyone can go for a ride last I checked… if you have several thousand dollars laying around, anyway.

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          So in theory if you built a vacuum tube from the earths surface to “space” and sealed it at both ends you could have a frictionless elevator

          • El Barto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I mean… sure. But you could do the same from the surface of Earth to the height of the Eiffel tower. Or my uncle Bob’s third floor apartment.

    • davidgro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      Much of the same could be said of the EmDrive. This is one of those extraordinary claims which requires extraordinary evidence, especially given the recent history of the topic.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I just want an Aluminum Falcon.

    I assume I won’t be able to afford the Millennium edition.

  • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I do wonder why we never ask why they are former NASA / Blue Origin / SpaceX whatever. Did they try to bring up some crazy idea and let go? Did they just lose it?

    Im always hopeful for new breakthroughs but always sceptical

  • Geek_King@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’d sure be nice if some break through like this was realized. But when you have a company to greatly benefit from this “impossible discovery”, hard to stay optimistic it isn’t some grift.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    After reading the article, and doing a little digging on this I can confidently say this article is utter garbage. You can look up the patent application on this, it’s something to do with electrostatic forces which is a well known area of physics. Nothing magical about it.

    For anyone curious, someone was kind enough to post the summary of the patent in this thread https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=60131.0

    • exscape@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Why would anyone want to kill him if this were true? It would be a dream for NASA and everybody else working in space flight.

      FWIW I’d bet almost anything this will be as useful as the EmDrive.

      • Delta_V@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        If someone already quietly had similar tech maneuvering their satellites, and wanted to remain the only actor with eyes in the sky that can’t be shot down or eventually chased down due to lack of fuel.

    • davidgro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It will disappear when nobody else can replicate and it becomes clear that it never really worked to begin with.