It would’ve been smarter of those companies to replace the bosses with AI.

This is a straight up lie because all these phones are glued together (nearly all are IP68) meaning that you need some special tools.

You’ll also need a battery, which in these cases then will come with a spudger, a tube of suitable glue, and instructions. Bring your own hairdryer I think is reasonable.

The idea is not so much that everyone will be replacing their own battery but that they could, which on the flipside then also means that shops will readily do it because they have no issue getting at parts and you don’t need to be a specialist to do it. What won’t fly is pulling an Apple and crypto-locking batteries to phones and requiring activation and only doing that for swaps made by the Apple store and stuff. Tesla tried to pull the same kind of shit with their cars in the EU and they got completely obliterated by regulations, up to and including price controls for their diagnosis software because they wanted to price out independent repair shops.

If you want a list of phones with actually replacable batteries try this.

Did you guys just stop testing after 15?

Times hundred. The labels have the zeroes, the database doesn’t.

Also “with regard to energy labelling” what is this labelling about? Energy? Ok then why are there values about the phones “Repeated free fall reliability” or IP protection inside there?

That “energy” label is an old and well-known scheme that people are actively looking for when shopping for things, makes sense to tack other sustainability stuff onto it if you want people to see it. Does it make sense? No. Does it make sense? Yes.

Map (Int, Int) Int. Kind of a bad example because tuples have special-case infix syntax, the general case would be Map Int (Either Int Bool). Follows the same exact syntax as function application just that types (by enforced convention) start upper case. Modulo technical wibbles to ensure that type inference is possible you can consider type constructors to be functions from types to types.

…function application syntax is a story in itself in Haskell because foo a b c gets desugared to (((foo a) b) c): There’s only one-argument functions. If you want to have more arguments, accept an argument and return a function that accepts yet another argument. Then hide all that under syntactic sugar so that it looks innocent. And, of course, optimise it away when compiling. Thus you can write stuff like map (+5) xs in Haskell while other languages need the equivalent of map (\x -> x + 5) xs (imagine the \ is a lambda symbol).

The actual reason why let … in syntax tends to not use C-style “type var” like syntax is because it’s derived from the syntax type theory uses, and type theorists know about parameterised types. Generics, in C++ parlance, excuse my Haskell:

let foo :: Map Int String = mempty

We have an empty map, and it maps integers to Strings. We call it foo. Compare:

Map Int String foo = mempty

If nothing else, that’s just awkward to read and while it may be grammatically unambiguous (a token is a name if it sits directly in front of =) parser error messages are going to suck. Map<Int,String> is also awkward but alas that’s what we’re stuck with in Rust because they reasoned that it would be cruel to put folks coming from C++ on angle bracket withdrawal. Also Rust has ML ancestry don’t get me started on their type syntax.

“Modern” is a bit misleading, x87 had fldpi. The whole x87 part of the standard has been deprecated with x86_64 in favour of the whole sse series of instructions and those don’t come with pi. You instead load a constant from program memory, just like any other.

As processors (as of yet) still support those legacy modes they will also contain the constant somewhere in probably microcode storage, calculating it on the fly makes literally no sense at all: It’s (for x87) 80 bits of data, much shorter than any imaginable program, smaller than any circuitry able to compute it so you’d be spending time to save no space which is pointless.

ARM, RISC-V etc. come from the RISC tradition so they wouldn’t be caught dead including such an instruction. Both have zero registers though as zero is an absurdly useful constant, simplifying things drastically, both on the hardware front as well as within the instruction set (move is add zero to source, save to destination, clear is add zero and zero, save to destination)

Now, that’s finite constants. In particular, it’s about floating point arithmetic, which is a wonder of maths and a deep rat’s nest of numerology, but has finite precision, it’s not true real arithmetic. Real real arithmetic is undecidable, in particular comparison and expansion to decimal form are undecidable. Printing infinite strings of digits is usually not what we want to do, and limiting precision of comparisons is… not ideal, but better than having limited precision at every operation: You can decide once you’re comparing how accurate you want things to be and don’t have to worry while writing down your formula (btw Herbie exists, and that’s why packages like this exist. In that case pi is not a constant but a formula, which can be expanded as needed. Quite slow compared to floating point hardware but when you need it you need it and even if you don’t it’s still useful as a sanity check, gives you an idea of how far off the floating point results are without having to call in a favour with a mathematician.

You don’t understand that’s just Hanseatic understatement.

Sandwich.hs:6:11: error: [GHC-83865]
    * Couldn't match type ‘Bread’ with ‘Cucumber’
        Expected: Bread
        Actual: Cucumber

This wouldn’t have happened with Burritos.

What if I told you that Germany is a federation. NRW would be the fifth largest US state, Bremen the third smallest (actually, almost identical population to DC), most of all the US has more states. They can do stuff in parallel that’s no excuse to not have quick election results. And now don’t come with “but there’s so much space in between” you’re not sending the results via horse buggy are you.

And, no, of course the federation doesn’t legislate on state elections. It gets to say how federal (and EU) elections are run. State’s rights my ass in Germany the federation has no tax office, it’s all collected by the states, and their police can’t put boots on the ground outside of international borders (incl. airports) and the train system (cf Amtrak cops). Certainly can’t just decide to invade a city like is happening in LA. They also don’t have anything like ICE, that’s all state responsibility.

Germany, with 100% paper ballots, has preliminary results in by the end of the night. That’s preliminary as in “everything has been counted, but we haven’t double-checked anything yet”. The final result comes later and has never differed in even close to significant ways from the preliminary one. Most of the time delay is not due to voting but to give people and courts time to deal with any challenge there might be.

The German constitutional court declared voting machines unconstitutional for the simple reason that they don’t allow people with just an ordinary education, no specialist knowledge, to ascertain for themselves that the vote is kosher.

The CCC actually tried to get them outlawed based on technical grounds, including that it’s impossible to have electronic voting that is both secure and private (“can’t prove to the Mafia boss how you voted” type of private), the judges listened intendedly and asked many smart questions, just to then turn around and say “yeah we barely understood that and we’re practically all professors and it’s our job, can’t expect J. Random Citizen to do that between shifts”.

As the old saying goes “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”

It may be convenient to look at classical interpretations but “The intuition we evolved to interact with macro systems is also applicable to the micro level” is in itself an extraordinary claim.

Anything that happens in LA is being attributed to protestors,

“The tactic that we’re not employing in LA has no effect in LA”.

I don’t actually disagree, but I think our hyper-connected social media makes it practically impossible to avoid the kind of cross-contamination that soils the optics of even a well-organized protest here

On the live feeds I watched I spotted exactly one protester who might have had training. She was good at leading a chant, that’s it. Noone had an understanding of the larger situation, everyone was driving by the seat of their pants.

Now, of course, it’s too late to build those structures, build professionalism, but in the civil rights era you had it. Rosa Parks didn’t just decide one morning to sit in the front of the bus, the thing had been prepared for months and months. Everything was gamed out, people trained to have the right reaction in every circumstance, the whole shebang.

Fun fact: I actually played “Greenpeace and police” on the primary school schoolyard. About ten people sit down, hook into each other’s arms, four or five “cops” try to separate them. That’s the kind of cultural diffusion you want, enough dissemination of tactics through workshops that primary school kids pick up random fun exercises as a game.

I think I’ll just leave you with a MLK quote I think is relevant.

Indeed, it is relevant: Because you still haven’t learned how to make yourself heard.

And it has failed to hear that large segments of white society are more concerned about tranquility and the status quo than about justice, equality, and humanity.

That’s not a call to violence. It’s a call to get out of a comfortable rut and fight for justice, equality, and humanity. Show me an MLK quote where he says “Yo dudes, just riot, man”. Especially the black civil rights movement was vulnerable to being portrayed as violent (racist stereotypes and everything). How did they get around that? Did Rosa Parks spit in the face of the cop who arrested her?

Maybe it’s different overseas, but from what I’ve seen written about it in our media you have the same problem.

“Protests were overwhelmingly peaceful with riots at the fringes”. The social media sphere is its own battleground, the AfD basically employs the same fake news outrage tactics as the MAGA sphere does in the US. No, you won’t get Fox News to change its narrative and to stop just making things up, but that’s not the only news network you have. Achieving anything on the social media front requires consistency and reach, honestly not my speciality. Ask someone who has never used a dial-up modem. Centrist-compatible edgy meme accounts with the occasional leap into the radical when the opportunity is right? Broad outreach is crucial otherwise the important stuff will stay in your bubble.

Also never forget that Antifa action can look like this. People do love to laugh at fascists, also liberals, even plenty of conservatives, give them plenty of opportunity to do so. Nick their clothes while they’re bathing, the whole republic was snickering. Those things are click magnets as you can see them being picked up even by US media.

how does that not still get used as justification for militarized escalation by police?

It splits the whole thing. Liberals can have their prayer vigil while the police is busy. Especially with jackboots, with individual motivation and not “crack down on them and I mean everyone” being the order from above, all you have to do is occupy them, they just want to have fun. Scratch that itch. Use their toys.

And then liberal media can go on waxing about non-violent protest, about that beautiful prayer vigil, how nice that is. Before, they couldn’t: Because there was no clear delineation, the vigil and the riot couldn’t be told apart. Thus you enable things getting air time, positive or at least neutral coverage, that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

And before you go on and say “but the whole US media landscape is captured by capital interest and racists” – yes. And the capitalists want their immigrants. They don’t, in principle, mind speaking of “ICE excesses”.

I think you’re just a shitlib who enjoys larping as an anarchist.

What I think is the actual issue here is an American incapability to actually organise. Last time you had a civil rights movement with any sort of discipline was, well, the civil rights movement. MLK, Black Panthers, etc. I suggest reading up a bit on what they did instead of jacking off to pseudo-insurrectionist fantasies.

the police were already escalating before the protests started.

You act as if that was something that never happens elsewhere. As if others haven’t found ways to deal with it. Me saying “Telling everyone to just throw stones is a stupid idea” is not an opinion, it’s observed history. It has been tried. It doesn’t work. Other approaches work better. But Americans, in their infinite wisdom, will do the right thing only after having exhausted every other possibility. Listening and learning from other people’s experience? Why, what’s the point, America is so exceptionally exceptional nothing could ever apply to you. Protesting with discipline, diversion, and de-escalation tactics cannot work because you have more people per capita or something. I retract that “fed” and will simply call you “yank”.

Lmao, the intent of black bloc is absolutely not an acknowledgement of peaceful protest, it’s an acknowledgement that violence is necessary against oppressive capitalist systems and state violence.

Yeah you’re stuck in the 80s. That type of black blocs wasn’t a tactic, it was Autonomous Marxists jacking off. They were starting shit on May Day for the purpose of starting shit. It had the net result of lowering attendance to union marches because, circling back to my very first comment: Not that many people fancy dodging burning trash cans. Name comes from the federal prosecutor describing them as “Schwarzer Block”, the translation and weird lack of k came later.

As a modern tactic the black bloc is, as I said, a lightning rod. Marching alongside, holding still, if police act up they’re shielding other protestors by engaging. Yes, it acknowledges that violence is necessary to defend a protest. Defence being the key word, here.

You’re ignoring like 30 years of development in protest tactics. What you’re trying to do, we’ve been there. Doesn’t work.

There’s a prayer vigil planned for today, isn’t there, what are you going to do? Come there in black, mingle with the grandmas, and start throwing molotov cocktails? You know who does that kind of thing? Agent provocateurs. That’s why I’ve been calling you a fed.

Yup, and with any luck Trump will continue with the lack of subtlety.

You’re being accelerationalist. Also that wasn’t Trump that was a local jackboot jacking off.

Either he’s a dictator or he can be obstructed by judicial paperwork. You can’t have a dictator that politely complies with the judiciary, that’s what makes them a dictator.

Who the fuck cares if the dictator complies, what matters is that the overall system complies. There’s still quite some inertia left in the gears of the rule of law, people around Trump (not him, he doesn’t care nor does he understand) know how to attack that but chances are they’re severely underestimating the task. Unlike back in the Weimar Republic, you e.g. don’t have a country full of judges considering law passed by parliament to not even be law because law must be passed by the Kaiser.

Noticed how the Border Tsar backed off when Newson (what’s he spelled I don’t care) told him “go, come arrest me”? That’s not the behaviour of a viceroy of a dictator, that’s the behaviour of one who would like to have that power, but doesn’t.

One of the first things btw that the Nazis did was to (functionally) dissolve the states and put them under direct federal control. That’s another reason why you want to shout “state’s rights” right now.

Not everyone can or should be in black bloc sabotaging ICE vehicles

The fuck are you doing that as a black bloc. Those are a lightning rod for police violence so that others can protest in peace, you don’t want the sabotage squad to be a lightning rod, you want them to be ninjas. Unseen, unheard, unnoticed. More of a warning west and not black hoodie kind of task.

And, see, suddenly we’re talking black blocs. An actual tactic. One that acknowledges the importance of peaceful protest, at the very least the necessity to separate yourself from the overall crowd, so that liberals can go to baby’s first protest because we want them in the street, actually seeing shit, feeling vibes, and not in front of the TV, watching propaganda. Not, as in the OP, “fuck this shit I want to smash things”, at least that’s the vibes that I got: Justification for a foregone conclusion, not a plan grown out of analysis of the overall situation.

You want to wait that long do something? Be my guest.

Who said anything about waiting? Stop posting and organise that shit. Don’t look at me I’m on the other side of the Atlantic.

Nothing the protestors actually do will move the needle - it’s the extreme overreaction of the fed that will.

Please look up opinion polling after the Kent State Massacre: It took years for public opinion to shift away from “the National Guard did nothing wrong”. For what you say to occur the overreaction has to not just be extreme, it also has to be obvious – like the Aussie journalist which got shot, that’s a good video. Things don’t become more obviously an overreaction when cars are burning and shopfronts are deglassed.

Liberals need to pick a lane - either trump is a dictator who must be removed before he solidifies his hold on power, or we need to conduct ourselves until the midterms so that we can vote our way out.

I wouldn’t argue for either. Both are unrealistic for various reasons and the latter isn’t a good in itself. What you want to do is obstruct the fuck out the feds so they fall on their face, that’s best done on a level of state and lower administrations. California isn’t cooperating with ICE so make sure to have the state’s back. Yes, I, an anarchist is saying “have the state’s back”, fascism is too large a threat to risk over feelings of disgust regarding liberal democracy. Last thing you want is the Governor seeing himself in a situation where he has to ask the feds to intervene to keep (a semblance of) order instead of being able to say “fuck off feds we got this”.

They don’t need an excuse.

To shoot? No. To justify themselves in the media, in the public eye? Yes.

It’s also wild to me that ‘throwing stones’ is somehow seen as more violent than literal fucking munitions and chemical weapons.

It’s not. That’s as much a shitlib take as “police violence isn’t violence because it’s state violence”.

But it’s the perception that exists among the population, you’re not going to change it by throwing stones.

Communities are fighting against unaccountable and un-identifiable gestapo pigs blackbagging innocent children

You know what people did to protect Jews from the Gestapo? Hide them. You can’t protect them by throwing stones for the simple reason that police dgaf when they’re hit by stones, they’ll just blackbag you alongside.

Look there’s exactly one thing I’m saying here: Act strategically. I’m not arguing against violence because it’s evil – at most, violence is unaesthetic. I’m arguing against it because, unless you start an actual insurrection with plans to take on and take out the military, it’s ineffective. Just because your pigs are worse than what we’re dealing with over here doesn’t mean that lashing out at them suddenly becomes good praxis. You’re there to have an effect, not to blow off steam.

There’s a massive fucking vibe difference between a crowd taking cover behind whatever is at hand and one setting fire to shit and throwing back stones is all I’m saying. Be the former vibe. Stones aren’t going to stop them. Assault rifles and tanks wouldn’t stop them. Pining for escalation hands them excuses on a platter for no strategic gain whatsoever, it’s pissing in the wind. The only law you should be breaking is refusing to follow a dispersal order, or at least take your sweet time with it, everything else is fedposting.

There’s a much better reason to not be violent: So that you can get more people onto the streets. Figures that most people don’t fancy dodging burning trash cans and you want everybody on the streets, not just your polycule. People need to feel like they’re safe at the protest, the only danger there is is coming from the state.

So that wasn’t sarcasm? Interesting. Possible instance of backwards causation, the physicists will be ecstatic.