Removed by mod

“We want liberty, justice, and freedom for all.” Awesome.

The media wants a horse race. Any foregone conclusion wouldn’t get people on the edge of their seats on election day.

The fact that this is possibly the case, and maybe even almost certainly so, is fucking aggravating.

However, I do believe this race is stupidly close, just because I have so little respect for a large proportion of the American electorate. When people eat that much sugar, drive rather than walk, and watch that much Right Wing propaganda, you’re going to get insanity.

It has made me smile to know I am not completely alone, thank you.

Removed by mod

I hope those people who feel as if they own the moral high ground will remember they had an opportunity to stop it

How many people died in Gaza today? I wish I had an opportunity to stop that.

but I live in the reality of the viable options

Yes, and I am unhappy that the options all involve ‘innocent people are dying right now’. This bothers me.

If it’s the moral high ground to say that killing is wrong, then it is also the moral high ground for you to say “The choice is either the people who are suffering may or will continue to do so, versus these same people suffering even worse”. You’re saying that hurting innocent people is bad, yes?

Having to choose to hurt some or more innocent people is not a choice I am enthused about, no matter what the practical reality is. It would be churlish to criticise someone without food for complaining about their practical choice between going hungry and starving, I feel.

Practical concerns do not replace morality. Someone might have no choice but to abandon their children because they cannot afford them: this does not stop them from being harmed by the moral weight of what, in all practicality, they had to do.

Every day is a half-day if you just say fuck it and leave.

You have a bad friend if he

Apparently, friends cannot be women or non-binary.

Either way, the reality any sane person can understand is that there are much better odds we see movement from Harris than we do from Trump.

I completely agree with that. I admit to being impatient for change now, because innocent people are dying now. It is sad that elections (and electorates) get in the way of such important moral principles.

Removed by mod

For someone who claims to have strong convictions you sure have a hard time actually standing up for and defending what you are saying.

I’m saying that killing people is wrong. If you showed me Harris had committed to holding Israel accountable and creating a ceasefire, I would be a big fan. It’s not hard to be better than Trump or the Republican party, they’re odious.

You can’t blame me for my perception that the Democratic party is aiding Israel by sending them weapons. You can blame me for caring about the lives of innocent people, though.

You’re not very good at holding a conversation. I’ll leave you to complaining about the media inventing sexism, racism and fascism. Maybe you will be excited to find out how fascist Americans can be when Trump fans harass voters as this election comes to a close. Or maybe you will start talking about how the media is inventing it.

I’ll vote for the candidate who wants a cease-fire

I would definitely vote for a candidate who committed to pushing through a cease-fire, if I could vote. And if that person wasn’t Trump, because he’d be lying. And he wouldn’t say that anyway, because it’s not macho enough.

Removed by mod

As a non-binary person who is under the trans gender umbrella, without being transgender in the sense of having transitioned across genders, I am careful with my language. I am not transgender in the way people typically understand.

Feel free to participate in non-binary erasure, I’m used to it. Humans love creating outgroups so they can bully each other, that is why I find myself not labelling myself as human. I think gender is stupid, and I think humans are rude.

On my instance, the UI doesn’t even give a downvote option. There’s probably a way around that, though, not that I am interested.

Getting rid of downvotes is, I think, a good thing.

It’s a fundamentally uncomfortable position. The people of Gaza matter

Thank you for saying this.

If I were American, I would surely vote for Harris. But I would want to have been able to do more to keep people safe from state terrorism.

Removed by mod

struggle with more than one issue that is 5000 miles away.

Humans could be killing innocent people in another galaxy. I still don’t approve of killing innocent people. Distance doesn’t matter.

If you must sacrifice humans elsewhere for the good of your political system, kill me. I accept the sacrifice. I will die in their place. I will give Israel my address. If someone must die, I will do it.

I just do not enjoy hearing, every day, about children being killed in bombings. It makes me not want to be alive.

It’s because there is a large, internally-polled segment of the Pennsylvania electorate who are Jewish and sympathetic to Israel.

Harris can’t afford to not court them.

I have no doubt she vehemently dislikes Bibi and would wish to cut aid.

I hope you are right. But, without evidence (if there is any, please share it), this might be wishful thinking. You might just be a more moral person than Harris. I might be being extremely unfair, but it doesn’t seem impossible for an elected official to be willing to sacrifice the lives of innocent people in a country without American voters to gain power.