Iran's president tells Sir Keir Starmer retaliation against Israel 'is a right' during rare phone call
news.sky.com
The prime minister tells President Masoud Pezeshkian he is "deeply concerned" amid growing fears Iran will retaliate against Israel over the killing of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh.

So Israel break international law and then Starmer asks Iran to just suck it up, saying it will put the ceasefire in jeopardy, ignoring the fact that Israel just assassinated the lead negotiator. What in the bloody fuck?

  • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netMEnglish
    2·
    3 months ago

    pointing out that when you say “iran and israel should face international justice”, you only mean “iran should face international justice” is relevant, yes

    But I don’t mean that. My posting history about Israel suggests nothing of the sort. It’s mostly me talking about what other people have said about Israel. When I do give my own opinions on Israel, they’re 1. To criticise Starmer’s earlier, weak position on Gaza; 2. To criticise Trump moving the US embassy. To characterise those comments as though they represent a year’s worth of pro-Israel comments is ludicrous.

    I’m not interested in talking about this any further with you.

    • whenyellowstonehasitsday@fedia.io
      12·
      3 months ago

      Also, it wouldn’t actually silence his critics on this, precisely because it won’t change anything. The war will continue, so people would just start demanding that [Starmer] demand issuing arrest warrants for Israeli government ministers who come to the UK, or trade embargoes, or whatever.

      i guess defending starmer’s “earlier, weak position on gaza” is more or less equivalent to criticism of it